The phone call that changed everything happened on June 2nd. President Trump dialed Chinese President Xi Jinping, and by the end of that conversation, Xi had agreed to restart the flow of rare earth minerals that China had been holding back for months.
That single phone call set the stage for what might become the most important trade agreement of 2025.
The Geneva Foundation Almost Crumbled
Just over a month ago, things looked promising. In May 2025, U.S. and Chinese negotiators met in Geneva and hammered out what seemed like a breakthrough. They agreed to a 90-day suspension of most tariffs over 100% to give both sides breathing room.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called the Geneva talks productive. The markets responded positively. For a brief moment, it seemed like the world’s two largest economies might actually find common ground.
But agreements on paper don’t always translate to action in the real world.
By April, China’s rare earth exports had plunged. These aren’t just any materials – they’re the building blocks of everything from smartphones to electric car batteries. When China restricts rare earths, the entire global supply chain feels it.
The numbers told a stark story. China’s exports to the U.S. dropped 34.5% in May alone. Meanwhile, the U.S. kept its restrictions on Chinese technology exports, including limits on advanced semiconductors and even Chinese student visas.
The Geneva truce was falling apart before it even had a chance to work.
When Economics Meets Diplomacy
The World Bank saw the writing on the wall. They slashed their 2025 global growth forecast to just 2.3%, citing trade tensions as a major factor. When the World Bank gets pessimistic, everyone pays attention.
That’s when the Trump-Xi phone call happened.
Details of the conversation remain scarce, but the outcome was clear. Xi agreed to restart rare earth flows, though he didn’t specify how fast or how much. It was enough to get both sides back to the negotiating table.
The venue choice was interesting – London’s Lancaster House, a place where historic deals have been struck before. Sometimes the setting matters as much as the substance.
Two Days That Could Change Everything
On June 9th, the heavy hitters arrived in London. The U.S. sent Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. China countered with Vice Premier He Lifeng, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, and Vice Minister Li Chenggang.
These aren’t junior officials. These are the people who actually make decisions.
The talks were supposed to last one day. They stretched into two. When high-level negotiations go longer than planned, it usually means one of two things: either everything is falling apart, or both sides are working hard to make something happen.
In this case, it was the latter.
The Framework That Could Change Markets
On June 10th, both sides announced they had reached agreement “in principle” on a framework to implement their trade truce. The details matter for anyone watching global markets.
China agreed to ease restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets. This is huge for manufacturing, especially in tech and green energy. Companies have been scrambling to find alternative suppliers, often at much higher costs.
The U.S. agreed to lift certain restrictions on microchips that China needs for manufacturing. But here’s the key detail – they’re keeping the bans on high-end Nvidia AI chips. This shows the U.S. is willing to compromise on regular tech trade while maintaining restrictions on cutting-edge AI technology.
It’s a carefully balanced approach that gives both sides something they need.
Reading Between the Diplomatic Lines
Trump’s reaction was cautiously optimistic. “We are doing well with China. China’s not easy,” he said, adding that he wanted to “open up China” to U.S. products.
That’s about as positive as Trump gets when talking about China.
Bessent emphasized the “productive nature” of the talks, while Chinese state media reported the agreement as a step forward. When both sides are saying positive things publicly, it usually means the private conversations went even better.
But here’s the catch – this is just a framework. Both Trump and Xi still need to give their final approval before anything actually happens.
What This Means for Your Portfolio
The immediate market implications are significant. Rare earth companies have been volatile for months as investors tried to predict Chinese export policies. Tech manufacturers have been building costly backup supply chains.
If this agreement holds, expect to see movement in several sectors:
Manufacturing companies that depend on rare earths could see cost relief. Tech firms might get access to chips they’ve been unable to source. Green energy companies building solar panels and wind turbines need these materials desperately.
On the flip side, companies that have invested heavily in alternative supply chains might see those investments become less valuable overnight.
The Reuters report on the agreement highlighted how quickly market dynamics could shift if the framework gets final approval.
The Bigger Economic Picture
This isn’t just about bilateral trade. The global economy has been holding its breath waiting for these two economic superpowers to find common ground.
Supply chains that have been disrupted for months could start flowing normally again. Inflation pressures from scarce materials could ease. Countries caught in the middle of U.S.-China trade disputes might finally get some clarity about the future.
But structural issues remain. China’s state-controlled economic system and the U.S. free market approach create fundamental tensions that go beyond any single trade agreement.
The Wall Street Journal’s analysis suggests this agreement addresses immediate practical problems while leaving deeper philosophical differences unresolved.
The Waiting Game Begins
As of today, nothing new has emerged beyond the June 10th framework announcement. No timeline for presidential approval. No details about implementation.
The global economy is essentially waiting for two phone calls – one from Trump, one from Xi – saying they approve the deal their negotiators worked out.
That uncertainty is both the opportunity and the risk. If both leaders sign off quickly, markets could rally on reduced trade tensions. If either side gets cold feet, we could see renewed volatility.
What Happens Next
Past trade agreements between these two countries have had mixed track records. The 2020 Phase One deal, for example, was partially implemented before getting derailed by other events.
This time feels different, partly because both economies need a win. China needs access to U.S. technology and markets. The U.S. needs reliable access to materials that power everything from defense systems to consumer electronics.
But “feels different” doesn’t guarantee success.
The Associated Press coverage emphasizes that this is still just a framework, not a final deal. Implementation details matter, and that’s where many trade agreements have stumbled before.
The Global Stakes
For crypto and finance enthusiasts watching global markets, this agreement represents more than just U.S.-China relations. It’s about whether the world’s two largest economies can find ways to cooperate rather than constantly escalate tensions.
Successful implementation could reduce one major source of global economic uncertainty. That would be bullish for risk assets, including crypto markets that often move on macro economic sentiment.
Failure, on the other hand, could signal that trade tensions will continue escalating, potentially triggering more defensive positioning across all asset classes.
A Framework, Not a Finale
The London talks produced something concrete – a framework both sides can work with. But frameworks aren’t finished deals.
The real test comes when Trump and Xi decide whether to transform this diplomatic progress into actual policy changes. Based on the Bloomberg reporting, both sides seem genuinely committed to making this work.
June 11, 2025, might be remembered as the day the world’s largest trade war started winding down. Or it might be remembered as another false start in a long-running economic conflict.
The difference between those two outcomes rests in the hands of two leaders who will make their decisions away from the cameras and negotiating tables of London.
For now, the global economy waits.
Author
